Next Interior Memos weekly digest, 2025-10-30

It’s spooky season in many ways

The US Capitol Building under partly cloudy skies earlier this year.
A little creepy around this place, where the House hasn't convened in 41 days, but the Senate is doing some work at least. CC-BY-SA Next Interior.

This has been a busy week for Interior and for Next Interior, even with the continued shutdown. We are again excited to be joined by the intrepid Tony Irish for a wrap-up of the RIF court case, then we have a summary of other news, including about Next Interior, and a quick survey for you, dear readers. If you are in the DC area and want an action item today, 3-5pm Eastern:

💡
Join Federal Unionists Network and partners in front of US Department of Agriculture* for a food drive!

📅 Thursday, October 30, 2025🕒 3:00–5:00 PM ET (Speaker program 3:30–4:30 PM)

📍 WHERE: Near U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Headquarters (rain or shine)1400 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20250(on the Mall just off Jefferson Dr. SW and opposite USDA HQ)

WHAT: As 42 million Americans face rising hunger — and on the 30th day of the shutdown — furloughed and fired federal workers will gather outside USDA Headquarters today from 3 to 5 PM to collect food for families in need and demand the release of $6 billion in emergency SNAP funds that remain frozen.

* Gotta stand with our fellow agencies in serving the people of the Nation!

Reductions In Force (RIF) news - Tony 

As expected, it was a busy week in the Northern District of California for the Shutdown RIF lawsuit brought by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and seven other unions against numerous agencies and officials of the federal government, including Interior. Thursday, Friday, and Monday saw assorted filings in support of (by the plaintiff unions) or opposition to (by the defendant agencies) the motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiffs last Monday (a preliminary injunction is generally a form of equitable remedy to prevent irreparable harm to a party during the lengthy process of a court case, here the primary remedy sought was a prohibition on RIF notices being issued that plaintiffs believe to be premised on an unlawful basis). On Tuesday the court held an in-person hearing on the motion, orally (mostly) granted the motion for preliminary injunction, and late in the night issued a lengthy written order explaining the court’s reasoning and clearly delineating the scope of the injunction.

Contrary to some media reports, the injunction is not so broad as to prohibit the issuance of any RIF notice during the shutdown. Rather, it solely prohibits the issuance of RIF notices during and because of the shutdown in any PPA (program, project or activity) or competitive area that includes any bargaining unit or member represented by one of the eight plaintiff unions. If a competitive area (what Interior is using) falls into that category, all employees, whether union members or not, are protected from RIF while the injunction is in effect. This at a minimum temporarily protects the 2,050 positions in 89 competitive areas Interior disclosed it was intending to imminently abolish earlier in the litigation. That disclosure was made before NTEU, IFPTE, and AFT joined as plaintiffs, so to the extent Interior may have RIFs planned in other competitive areas, those with NTEU, IFPTE, and AFT representation will also fall within the scope of the RIF.

Additionally, the court ordered each agency to file by Tuesday, November 4 “an accounting of any RIFs that have been issued on or after October 1, or that were in preparation at the time of this Court’s [various court orders that spanned October 15 through October 28].” The accounting must at a minimum include each impacted competitive area, whether the competitive area includes anyone covered by the injunction, the total number of employees in the competitive area, and the number of employees in that competitive area protected by the court’s injunction (which should always either be zero or the number of employees in the area due to the scope of the injunction).

Though the current relief and promise of further information regarding Interior’s planned RIFs is welcome, it may not be lasting. Three issues are in play that could alter the relief:

  • First, the government has asserted that Interior’s RIFs predated the government shutdown and were in no way motivated by or pursuant to the OMB and OPM shutdown RIF guidance that is the basis of the case, and therefore Interior should be excluded from the injunction. At the hearing the judge indicated that the existing record before the court is conflicted on that point and ordered an evidentiary hearing to better elucidate and understand the relevant facts. The judge does appear somewhat open to excluding agencies from the injunction if they can demonstrate that their RIF plans were unconnected to the shutdown, though plaintiffs have also advanced arguments that appropriations law would prohibit the RIF activities during a shutdown regardless and such agencies should remain enjoined. 
  • Second, the government is widely expected to appeal the preliminary injunction and could obtain partial or total relief at the 9th Circuit or Supreme Court. 
  • Third, the plaintiffs’ legal case is partly premised on the shutdown itself, so what life the case has once Congress and the President finally make appropriations for FY26 is unclear, at least to me. 

Whether any one of these three dominoes will fall before the 4th and Interior otherwise has to make its RIF accounting remains to be seen.

Those interested in reading the judge’s reasoning as well as the precise terms of the preliminary injunction can find the order containing both here. All filings in the case to date (and future filings as they are made and added to the system) are available here

We will continue to provide further updates as the litigation proceeds. Fed-focused reporting outlets including Government Executive and Federal News Network have also been timely reporting on significant developments in the case.

Other news of note

Resources

Science and knowledge

For this issue, a focus on climate science news, including: 

Tribes

Other news

Next Interior news

Reader survey

Click here if reading in your email, otherwise the form is embedded:

Spooky season

We’re living in concerning enough times as it is, so no need to add scariness…but hope you will enjoy some slightly pumpkins!

Two jack-o-lanterns, one smiling with buck teeth, one eating a smaller pumpkin, at night and illuminated by candles.
Have a happy Halloween!