Next Interior Memos weekly digest, 2025-09-04

Integrity matters: a recurring theme

Trees silhouettes against a night sky witha. few clouds, and two owls visible in the dead top of one of the trees.
The other night, a couple of Great Horned Owls - see them in the trees? - visited us and hooted away for this fun photo. The owls, like all migratory birds, are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which is administered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service at Interior. Photo BY-CC-SA J. Malcom.

Welcome to the start of fall, at least the post-Labor Day fall. Cool fronts are starting to pass across the continent, Congress is back in session, and all manner of things are in motion. But before we get going, take a moment to take action:

Take action

Help protect the US Forest Service's Roadless Rule!

Learn more and take action

This week’s digest is going to start off by framing several items through the lens of integrity, touch on a few things coming up, and end with a quick explanation of that action item for you—yes you!—to take if you didn’t already.

What happened

  1. At some point we’re going to need to decide when the administration’s contempt of renewable energy is actually just avarice and corruption in plain sight. I suspect if we look around, that line is behind us. Consider the continuing attacks on wind projects, such as stopping nearly complete projects like Revolution Wind off Connecticut, and the news this morning of remanding permits for New England Wind. As noted previously, the administration is using all sorts of justifications—they suddenly love whales or birds? Nah, it’s a smokescreen—to carry out the attacks. Heatmap characterizes it as a “blitz” or “war” on wind. 

Through it all, the lack of integrity is glaring. And when you then see projects moving ahead because a governor has agreed to move ahead with gas pipelines like Empire Wind in New York it just reeks of corruption—”dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people” (M-W). 

The Secretary is well-known for being cozy with oil and gas; Tyler Hassen, a former oil executive is (was, see below) the head of the Department’s Policy, Management, and Budget office. There’s plenty of reason folks like House Natural Resources ranking member Rep. Huffman are digging into ethics and financial issues with Tyler. I keep thinking about what the late, great Molly Ivins said: they’re gonna dance with the one who brung ‘em.

(Side note: As I was writing this newsletter, I saw that there’s a new Secretary’s Order and Tyler Hassen is no longer listed as part of political leadership; he may now be gone. But the SO opens other questions, like why is the administration’s nominee for the head of the USDA Forest Service now in the “acting” role that Tyler held? It seems odd and I haven’t found anyone who has an answer. Worth noting that Mr. Boren has trouble understanding and following the laws related to the agency he’s tapped to run.)

  1. This week, a group of 85 climate experts published their analysis of the Department of Energy’s climate document—I’m not going to call it a report, which might connote some semblance of respectability—and submitted it as a comment. You will not be surprised to learn that DOE’s document is riddled with lies, misleading statements, and errors; the authors and purveyors of DOE’s climate document lack integrity. The experts’ report is over 400 pages long, well documented, and thorough; it is a demonstration of integrity. I would recommend everyone grab a copy to keep handy, if not read in full. Looking for something shorter? Be sure to check out this resource from Carbon Brief that provided a rapid response to DOE’s document. As I’ve discussed elsewhere, this is the Merchants of Doubt strategy.

And not to be left out of compromised integrity and climate, House Republicans, led by Rep. Comer, are now seeking to intimidate the National Academies of Sciences by “investigating” the Academies’ rapid assessment of the DOE document and implications for agencies like EPA and its Endangerment Finding. Seriously folks, how do they think it ends by pretending physics don’t exist? 

Other news:

What’s coming up

There’s a lot going on up at Capitol Hill since Congress is back. A few notes:

Action Opportunity: Defend the Roadless Rule

This action item is part standing in solidarity, part self interest for Interior. 

As noted back in July when I was at the Western Governors’ Association meeting in Santa Fe, the US Department of Agriculture intends to rescind the Roadless Rule…and they just kicked off that process. The first of what should be several public comment periods closes on September 19, 2025.

In solidarity, this is a time to step up for all our public lands, including those managed by the Forest Service. It’s all-hands-on-deck.

The self-interest angle is because we’re in this together: Interior has to manage its resources at landscape scales, and that includes Forest Service lands. Wildlife don’t care which side of a boundary they’re on; they move back-and-forth. Adaptation to climate change means being able to change across landscapes. Water, fire…the list goes on. If the Forest Service loses its roadless areas—which are associated with lower wildfire rates, better water quality, better results for wildlife, and more benefits—then losing the benefits will spill over to Interior’s lands, waters, and responsibilities.

So help us take action!

Take action

Help protect the Forest Service's Roadless Rule:

Learn more and take action

Parting Shot

Desert scrub landscape with a sign on the left, and partly cloudy skies overhead.
One of my favorite places to be, Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuge in southeast Arizona, is just over the hill from a roadless area managed by the Forest Service in the Chiricahua Mountains. It would be a huge loss to lose the roadless protections, new roads be built, and then a fire start that comes over the hill and burns up this refuge. Photo CC-BY-SA J. Malcom.